Supabase pricing: usage quotas and the spend cap — Hovvi
How Supabase pricing pairs named usage meters and marginal rates with a default-on spend cap and hands the whole table to agents as Markdown.
Published by Hovvi Research. Observed ; materially updated .
What happened
State every allowance and marginal rate on one page and ship the spend cap enabled so scaling past the plan is a deliberate act. Publish each meter's free boundary, included allowance and marginal rate, then bound total exposure with a default-on spend cap.
Evidence
Every meter names its boundary and rate.
| Meter | Free boundary | Pro allowance | Marginal rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly active users | 50,000 | 100,000 | $0.00325 per additional MAU |
| Database disk | 500 MB | 8 GB | $0.125 per additional GB |
| Projects | 2 active projects | First project included | Additional projects from $10 / month |
One Micro instance covered
$10.00 monthly credit on paid plans
- Included compute credit
- $10 / month
- Micro instance
- covered by the included credit
- Billing granularity
- compute billed hourly
A default-on ceiling before surprise bills.
The Pro plan ships with its spend cap enabled, so additional resources require an explicit opt-out — published marginal rates arrive with a hard cost boundary.
Observed facts
- The Free plan includes 50,000 monthly active users, 500 MB database, 5 GB egress and 1 GB file storage at $0, limited to two active projects and paused after one week of inactivity.
- The Pro plan starts at $25 per month with the first project included and additional projects from $10 per month, 100,000 monthly active users then $0.00325 per additional MAU, 8 GB database disk then $0.125 per additional GB and 250 GB bandwidth.
- Paid plans include $10 per month of compute credits described as enough to cover one Micro instance, and compute instances are billed hourly.
- The Pro plan has a spend cap enabled by default to keep costs under control; scaling beyond the plan's included quota requires explicitly switching the spend cap off.
- The pricing page exposes Copy as Markdown, Ask ChatGPT and Ask Claude actions that hand the pricing table to agents in machine-readable form.
Editorial inference
- A default-on ceiling converts usage pricing from a trust problem into a bounded choice; Hovvi should pair published retrieval quotas with a default usage limit and agent-readable rate tables.
Evidence views
- Plan boundary
- Meter definition
- Worked compute example
- Spend cap control
- Agent-readable rate table
Founder takeaway
Publish every meter and rate, then make the cost ceiling the default so scaling is a deliberate act.
Use when
- Usage spans several independently measured meters
- Surprise bills are a known adoption blocker
Avoid when
- The product cannot enforce a spending ceiling
- Meters are too interdependent to state marginal rates
Next implementation step
Design a backend pricing experience that explains every usage meter, its marginal rate and a default cost ceiling before scaling.
Acceptance criteria
- A founder can state the free boundary and each Pro meter without opening documentation
- A worked example reconciles the compute credit, hourly billing and instance coverage
- The spend cap is presented as enabled by default with an explicit opt-out
- Marginal rates appear beside their allowances on the same surface
- Historical rates cannot appear without their observation date
Related cases
- First project to its meter: Supabase project activation flow — Hovvi
The activation flow stops at the account boundary while the pricing case explains the quotas, marginal rates and default-on spend cap that govern the project a new account creates.
Version history
Current snapshot: snap_supabase_pricing_2026_08_25 — Added the Supabase pricing dossier: named free quotas, published Pro allowances and marginal rates, hourly compute credits, the default-on spend cap and agent-readable pricing actions.
Use with an Agent
Example read-only MCP query:
Retrieve the Hovvi Founder case fc_supabase_pricing_spend_cap_2026_08 with observed facts, evidence screens, applicability limits and citations.